Showing posts with label 投资-Investment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 投资-Investment. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

《善用投资工具,能使你在投资路上事半公倍》

《善用投资工具,能使你在投资路上事半公倍》

*免费电子报 IOS VERSION
1)南洋商报(星期一 ~星期日)
2)the edge financial daily (星期一~星期五)
3)the sun (星期一 ~星期五)

*投资银行所提供免费投资工具
1)hongleong investment bank 的equity tracker
2)cimb investment的fundamental screener
3)rhb investment bank的research report
4)maybank investment bank 每天都提供research report
http://research.maybank-ib.com/
5)hwangdbs 提供的research report
http://einvest.hdbsib.com/bin/home.asp

*免费投资工具
1)klse stock screener
http://www.klsescreener.com/quote.php

*投资论坛和交流网站
1)cari forum
2)investalk
http://www.investalks.com/forum/index.php
3)sharefolio
http://sharefolio.net/home.php

*免费投资资讯网站
1)klse i3investor
http://klse.i3investor.com/index.jsp
2)《the star 》investing column
http://www.thestar.com.my/Business/Investing.aspx
3)bloomberg ios version

共勉之

Friday, October 11, 2013

我要成为一个有钱的 engineer

我觉得有两个重点:
1. 每个人肯定会有他自己的一个特殊强项, core competency。
他可能是企业收入很强,
也可能是靠产业起家的,
又或者是靠股票致富的,
还是他是个打工皇帝都好,
每个人都会有自己一个比其他几项特出的强项。
同时,joye 兄可能误解了我的意思。。。
要分散投资,或者拥有多项 asset category,
不代表你每项 asset category 都是要很特出或者一样强才能去做的。

另外,
也必须要根据自己的能力去发展适合自己的投资理财。
比如做生意会赚大钱,但是是不是每个人都有能力把生意做好?
虽然房地产可以高杠杆,是不是每个人都有能力找到好的项目?有可否长期找到好的房地产?
股票简单操作,是不是每个人都在这几年赚大钱?
做工赚钱,也不是每个人都可以有满意的工钱。


你重复使用这样的语言,和问这样的问题,
很大可能就印证了你是抱着样样都必须自己懂,才会去做的,单打独斗的想法。

是谁说,自己没有能力找到好的产业投资项目,就不能投资产业赚钱的?
陈总的投资者们,都是赚钱能力强,或者有生意底子,但是不会找产业投资项目,没有时间管理产业的人。
陈总本身工作收入不强,初期没有财务底子,但却可以帮这些有资金的人找良好的投资项目加以管理。
以我和女友的经历为例子,我和女友当时甚至还是没有资金,也没有能力的人,也在投资着产业。

是谁说,自己选股和分析能力不强,股票经验不多,就不能投资股票赚钱的?
巴菲特20岁出头的时候,没有多少财富,但有很多比他更有钱的人,
长期都出席巴菲特所开的夜班课程,跟他学习投资股票。
巴菲特,也是曾经做过没有钱,但是开班卖投资课程赚钱的一族。
不过,很多自认崇拜巴菲特的粉丝,竟然是很抗拒看到开班卖投资课程的投资者。
我朋友的圈子里,也有些例子是帮生意人管理股票资金和选股的。

是谁说,自己没有做生意的头脑和能力,就不能够通过做生意赚钱的?
合伙经营生意行不通吗?很多人还是回到同一个 pattern。。。合伙,会有很多麻烦,信不过别人。
自己穷,生意模式明明有潜能,却因信任问题而多多挑剔。

我甚至见过,自己工作能力超级烂的上司,还是可以成功做到打工皇帝的。
因为他懂得杠杆和使用人才,建立团队,而不是单打独斗。
不懂大家有没有遇过这样的上司呢?你明明觉得他似乎很无能,但他偏偏却是你的上司。




2. 先有了成功者的精神,才会有成绩;还是等有了成绩,才会有成功者的精神?

四大领域里。。。Physical, Mental, Emotional, Spiritual
精神,Spirit。。。落在 Spiritual 的级别里。
一个人的 Spirit,和他设给自己的 identity,有很密切的关系。

而主导我们行动的次序,往往是从 Spiritual -> Emotional -> Mental -> Physical 的次序往下降低。

举个例子,我们看到很多人拥有投资的产业,这是 physical results。
他们上过产业投资课程,明白了当中的程序和要诀,这些是知识或资讯,是归在 mental 的领域。
而很多时候,他们往往是有知识和资讯,但是无法克服自己对失败的恐惧,fear,而不行动。
恐惧,fear。。。是归在 Emotional 的领域里。

又或者,他们并不恐惧失败和风险,只是偏偏这个策略和自己的 identity 有很多无谓的价值冲突,
比方说。。。他潜意识里,他是不想做一个拥有负债的人。。。这是一种 identity。
又或者说,他认为过量举债会危害国家社会;从事这些不事生产的产业投资,对经济没有贡献,
而他自己又想要做个好人或者“有实际贡献”的人。。。这也是一种 identity。
又或者说,有些人认为快速致富,或者投资股票。。。是很不踏实的想法,
而他很想做一个踏实的人,这也是一种 identity。
只要这些 identity 依然存在,不管他学过多少工具,懂多少东西,他多数都是做不出成绩的。

(很多人去上 PLC,或者去上 MMI,还是 Anthony Robbins 的课程。。。
他们以为,他们是主要去拿 info 和工具,加强他们的知识和 mental 的。
上了课之后好像没有拿到 info,或者认为 info 都是老调重提,就在那里扮受害者呱呱叫。 
其实,在这些课程当中,info 和工具是最不值钱的。。。辅助 shape 我们的 identity,
还有一个对 emotions 有正面能量的环境,才是重点。
Mental 的 info 和工具知识,只是附加的价值。
相信最近大家应该也开始深深体会到,info 和工具。。。
是多么的不值钱了,因为计划赶不上变化,info 和工具。。。很快就会过时了。
今天你在课程或哪里拿到一个最新 info,下午人家传出去时,明天就已经不值钱了。)


相反的,如果一个人一开始即使一无所有,没有资金,没有能力,没有人脉,
但他在这种情况之下依然设给自己一个成功者的 identity。。。

比方说。。。
a. 股神巴菲特明明还是一个20岁出头没有钱的黄毛小子,却胆粗粗地向有钱人开班授课教投资,
因为他一开始就设定了给自己“我是一个成功投资者”的 identity。
(谈到这里,我是不赞成那些“要先亏过钱,才懂得赚钱”的说法或想法。
试想看,一开始就给自己这样烂的一个 identity - "我是个股票新手,看来要先亏过钱才能赚钱",
他的 results 很大可能也是之后没多久就亏大钱的。。。之后能不能赚钱就很难说。)

b. 马云创业初期时,他对网络 internet 懂个屁?资金又没有,团队人才也没有。
但是,你看他初期向多个伙伴、团队和投资者 proposed 集资时,
他的 language 和姿态,是一个怎么样的 identity?
他几乎是一开始就假设自己已经是个伟大的企业家。

c. Bill gates 和 Mark Zuckerberg 在还未成名前,
他们对电脑、社交网络和自己的产品也是相当自信的。。。难听点叫很串和高调。
他们也一样设了成功者的 identity 给自己。



别拿些太远的例子。。。拿些现实里认识的人。。。
陈总在2009年之前,生意失败,一无所有。
他那个期间时的股票和产业分享中,他是给了自己一个怎么样的 identity?
虽然很多人可能会不满他高调的方式。。。但他在那时确实也是设了一个成功者的 identity 给自己,
之后才会陆续吸引到今天的成绩。

我并不是认同他们高调的方式。成功的 identity,不一定是要高调。但是我们必须要先拥有一个成功的 identity。
这里也不是说我们必须要骗自己那样给自己一个 identity。
只是,如果我们无法创造和接受这样的 identity,我们几乎是很难成功的。
我想指出的重点是。。。这些人很多时候,他们在还未有 physical results 前,
他们就已经处于或拥有那样的 identity 了。
而不是等他们有了 physical 的 results,他们内心的 identity 才成型的。

我不懂鱼大在年轻时设了些什么样的股票 identity 给自己,
不过我记得他有分享过。。。他是不想做一个没有钱的 engineer。
反过来说,即使他选择留下做 engineer。。。
他一开始也是设了一个“我要成为一个有钱的 engineer ” 的 identity 给自己。
(注:他没有说过,我要做一个很出色的 engineer 哦  

不懂大家又有没有想过,自己设了一个怎么样的 identity 给自己?
或者自己舒适于哪一种 identity 呢?



至于GUH 和 NESTLE 的说法。。。我认为那是扯得太远,断章取义了。
不想讨论。

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Two Numbers To Focus on For Dividends

Dividends are a source of regular income for investors. Because of that, it should be no surprise that the dividend yield of a share is an important part of the investor’s decision-making process as it clues an investor in to the current income he or she can receive.
But, it can be dangerous to focus on a share’s dividend yield alone.
Instead, here are two metrics that investors can include in their tool-kit for a better analysis of a company’s dividends: Free Cash Flow; and Net Cash Balance.
What’s a Free Cash Flow?
In the daily course of every business, it either generates or consumes cash. When a business is able to generate cash, it then uses the cash to touch-up existing income-producing assets. After which, any left-overs can then be allocated by management to pay out dividends; make acquisitions; expand the business’s asset base; store it in the proverbial “vault”; or buy-back shares, among others.
That left-over cash is known as Free Cash Flow. Mathematically, the numbers can be gleaned from a company’s Cash Flow Statement and the equation’s given as:
Free Cash Flow = Cash Flow from Operations – Purchase of Property, Plant & Equipment (otherwise known as Capital Expenditures)
… And What’s a Net Cash Balance?
The Net Cash Balance tells us how much cash a company has stored up for future use, net of all debt. Companies with a large Net Cash Balance have an additional safety net to rely on to pay creditors, bills, suppliers, wages, loans, even dividends etc. when its business runs into any temporary slowdown in which it is unable to generate sufficient cash.
The required figures are found in the company’s Balance Sheet and its equation is given as:
Net Cash Balance = Total Cash & Equivalents – Short-Term Debts & Long Term Debts
Why the cash is important
While dividend investors often like to focus on the pay-out ratio, which measures dividends as a percentage of net income, we have to bear in mind that ultimately, dividends are paid out in cash.
Companies can report great profits but without booking the actual cash into its coffers, it is going to find it difficult to pay out dividends in the future. So, even though it’s important for companies to have profits, we should also keep an eye on the cash.
A Tale of Two Dividends
Let’s use Japanese ramen-restaurant operator Japan Foods Holding (SGX: 5OI) and industrial fishing company China Fishery Group (SGX: B0Z) as examples on the importance of the two metrics: Free Cash Flow and Net Cash Balance.
CompanyPrice per shareDividend Yield*
Japan FoodsS$0.793.2%
China FisheryS$0.3755.1%
*Based on last completed financial year’s full-year payout

Both companies have dividend yields higher than the Straits Times Index’s (SGX: ^STI) yield of around 2.6% (using the index tracker SPDR STI ETF’s (SGX: E3B) data as a proxy) so they might both be considered attractive dividend shares on that basis alone.
China Fishery might even be considered the more lucrative of the two based on its higher yield. But, a different picture emerges when we consider the companies’ Free Cash Flow and Net Cash Balance, as seen from the charts below.
2 numbers to focus on graph 12 numbers to focus on graph 2

We can see from the charts that Japan Foods has seen both its Free Cash Flow and Net Cash Balance grow steadily over its last five completed financial years (FYs). Meanwhile, China Fishery has had cumulative Free Cash Flow of negative US$15m over its last five completed FYs and consistently carried more debt than cash.
Under such a backdrop, it’s not that surprising to see China Fishery’s dividend fall to 1.9 Singapore cents per share for FY 2012 from a bonus-share-adjusted 5.48 Singapore cents per share for FY 2008.
Investors who tracked profits alone would likely be left scratching their heads on the big drop in dividends as the industrial fishing company’s earnings per share dropped by ‘only’ 30% from US$0.11 to US$0.076 in the same time period.
But for those who had been keeping an eye on China Fishery’s Free Cash Flow and Net Cash Balance, it would have been clearer to them that the company was just not able to bring in sufficient cash.
Meanwhile, Japan Foods – with growing Free Cash Flows and a balance sheet that becomes healthier with each passing year – has been able to grow its dividends from a bonus-share-adjusted 0.167 Singapore cents in FY 2009 to 2.5 Singapore cents in FY 2013 as the company is able to generate ample cash from its daily job of dishing out ramen and more to diners.
The Japanese ramen-restaurant operator, with its historical ability to generate Free Cash Flow and to maintain a healthy balance sheet, could be seen as a better choice than China Fishery for future dividends, ceteris paribus.
That’s especially so in light of the higher perceived risk of the latter dropping its dividends still further if it continues to struggle in producing meaningful Free Cash Flows from its business in the future.
Foolish Bottom Line
Every publicly listed company has to prepare three financial statements: the Income Statement; Cash Flow Statement; and Balance Sheet. All three have to be studied together to paint a holistic picture of a company’s financials and business condition.
That’s important for every investor – not just for dividend investors – to keep in mind.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...