Wednesday, June 20, 2012

‎--建立需求人脈--

‎--建立需求人脈--

很多人以為我創業時,靠的是家族與父親的幫忙。事實上,我沒有從家裡拿任何一毛錢。我不希望自立門戶後,又用家裡的資源,導致我的事業又變成家族的分支企 業,這樣我就白走創業這一遭。但沒有錢怎麼創業?其實我是在沒有任何抵押品的情況下,向66位朋友,籌到了1.6億元的創業資金

很多人問,為何我可以借到這麼多錢?

也很多人因而問我:「人脈要怎麼建立?」我始終認為不要講人脈,要講人緣。人脈是有目的、有功利因素存在的,而人緣則是讓別人喜歡你,只要你人緣佳,人脈自然就好。

現在年輕人常說,我在Facebook上有600個朋友,但其實他真正認識的沒有幾個。當他有困難時,600人之中,又有多少人能幫助他?

這就是人脈,不是人緣。大家以為透過網路聯絡感情很容易,一個按鍵就能送出新年祝福給600個朋友,其實往往他的朋友就是因為這樣被他搞丟。像我過年收到罐頭簡訊,不會有太多感覺,也常直接刪掉。

所以建議大家不如把600個朋友刪除剩60個,保持跟這60個人的聯絡。可以見面,就不要講電話;可以講電話,就不要透過電腦螢幕,這樣才能建立人緣。

而 我的人緣是如何建立的?我想是因為我從出社會到創業的11年間,每天都會留意身旁人的需求。

例如,當別人問我:「這個單字你懂不懂?」我絕不會說:「不懂。」我會說:「我幫你查一查。」別人問:「你認不認識某某某?」我絕不會說:「不認識。」我會說:「我想誰應該認識他,我幫你問一問。」

當你有幫助人的習慣時,別人就會自動來找你。一年365天,11年來我已累積了4千多個幫忙。

不過,記住這個4千多個幫忙,千萬不要一次提領光,這樣大家才會覺得你是可交的朋友。

我當初在家族企業工作,根本沒有想到有一天我會創業,所以之前對別人的幫忙都出自真心,於是當我創業需要資金時,大家都是一呼百應,有位當兵同袍甚至拿了房子讓我去抵押。

這是團體作戰時代。古代可以獨善其身,好好讀書,中個舉人、狀元,你的人生就成功了。但在現代社會,一個人是不可能成功的。

因此,我常跟年輕人說,當別人搭一座橋過來找你時,你不要把它拆掉,你要讓他走過來,你再走過去,彼此才有互動。若把橋拆掉,你會變成離群索居,人生就很難成功。


網路轉載-戴勝益

Saturday, June 16, 2012

8%的回酬

近期时常和学生聊起创业, 投资和理财,
医师年轻时走了约二十年的冤枉路, 
希望他们不会步上同样的路程.
除了鼓励他们出来创业开医务所外,
医师也提及如何善用现有的资金和FORESEE 将来会赚的钱.

昨晚和啊杰提到资金的量的问题,
医师交代说不要小看小量的资金和平淡的回酬,
但重要的是确立正确的大方向. 
医师有提过每年从股市里头寻求8%的回酬,
这个8%可以因为量的差别而起着不一样的感受! 
RM一千 的8%年回酬只是RM80可能只够和家人吃一餐饭,
RM十千 的8%年回酬是RM800 可能可以帮忙还一个月的月租
RM一百千 的8%年回酬 RM8000 已经可以看到一个象样的$
RM一百万 的8%年回酬 RM80000 就是一个中等的个人年收入! 
医师定下的目标:
投入一百五十万在股市里,
8%的年回酬就有一百二十千,
等于每月拥有十千的被动收入,
酱已经足够支付自由自在和轻松的生活. 

所以,
不要小看小笔的资金而放弃正确的大方向,
不要因为资金小而尝试以小博大的心态去搞投机,
重要的是如何加强自己的赚钱能力以便把资金增大!
资金一旦增多了, 
8%的回酬就会很可观! 

所以,
也不要小看那个8%,
同样的是8%,
小笔资金看不到有意义的赚额,
但资金的量够大时回酬就很够用了.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

OSPF Design Best Practices

OSPF Design Best Practices

VERSION 1 

Introduction


This documents lists best practices used in OSPF Design.

Requirements

There are no specific requirements for this document.

OSPF best practise



Summarization Techniques

Summarizing intra-area routes is recommended in most cases.
•If an area has multiple ABRs, then the summarization for the same range of routes should be configured on all the ABRs in the area.
•Since summarization for the same range of addresses on multiple ABRs in some topologies (typically hub and spoke topologies) can, in some    situations, cause  routing black holes it is generally best to have at least one link between two ABRs summarizing the same address space within the  non-backbone area.
•Make sure that the ‘null 0’ route (discard route) is installed for the summarized address ranges to avoid routing loops in some scenarios.
•It is preferable to set manually the cost of the summary route, or use a loopback interface in the summarized IP address range to prevent the  summary cost  from changing due to network changes within the area.
•Having more than one ABR for areas is recommended for redundancy.
•Keep the number of ABRs for an area reasonable (2–4) in order to limit the number of summary LSAs within the domain.
•If a normal OSPF Area needs to know only selective summary LSA  from other Areas and not all the summary LSAs, then configure LSA type 3  filtering at the  ABRs.

Type 3 LSA Filtering


•If a normal OSPF Area needs to know only selective summary LSA  from other Areas and not all the summary LSAs, then configure LSA type 3  filtering at the ABRs.
•The Type -3 Filtering need to be configured on all the ABRs in an Area

External Routes


•Summarize externally learned routes at the redistribution point (ASBR) to reduce the external LSAs where possible, since external LSAs are flooded  throughout the OSPF domain.
•Avoid configuring redistribute connected under the OSPF routing process. Instead, use the network statement under OSPF process and mark those  interfaces as passive.
•If redistribution is required, limit it to as fewer routers as possible.

Stub Areas

Note: All the points here assume there is more than one ABR present in each Area.

•Use Stub Area where optimal routing to and from within the Area to the rest of the OSPF Areas is needed but optimal routing to reach the external AS  routes from within the Area is not   an important consideration.
•Use Totally Stubby Area where optimal routing to and from devices within an area to the rest of the OSPF domain or external AS routes is not an  important consideration.
•Use NSSA Area if Stub Area characteristics are required, but also need to import External AS routes within this Area.
•Use NSSA Totally Stub Area if Totally Stub Area characteristics are required but also need to import External AS routes within this Area.
•Consider using an NSSA Area (NSSA or NSSA Totally Stub) if there are many ASBRs in an area redistributing routes in a way that cannot be  summarized at the ASBR (redistributing point)   itself, but combined redistributed external routes can be summarized at the NSSA ABR towards the  backbone. 
•Configure a loopback address as part of a NSSA Area in an ASBR. This will help avoiding sub-optimal routing.

Redistribution


•Where Possible, Avoid mutual redistribution at multiple points
•Configure administrative distance in such a way that each prefix native to each protocol or process is reached via the corresponding domain’s protocol  or process.
•Control the prefixes (using distance or/and prefix-list  / tag combination) in a way that the same prefix is not advertised back to the originating  domain.

Router id


•Configure a deterministic router ID for OSPF process, using router-id command.
•Choose the router ID (IP address) from the same OSPF area address space the router belongs to. This helps in route summarization, in case these  router IDs need to be routed.
•If OSPF router ID needs to be routable, configure a loopback interface with the same IP address and include it under the OSPF process.
•If applications like DLSW+, IPSec, etc., require optimal routing, configure separate loopback interface(s) and use IP addresses from a different  address space which is not summarized at the ABRs. These addresses can be leaked as more specific routes to other areas for optimal path  selection.

Process ID


•Although OSPF process ID has local significance to the router, it is recommended to have the same process ID for all the routers in the same OSPF  domain. This improves configuration consistency and eases automatic configuration tasks.



Authentication


•If security is of primary concern, use MD5 authentication between the OSPF neighbors



Interfaces


•Configure the OSPF auto-cost reference bandwidth through out the OSPF domain to higher than the highest bandwidth link in the network.
•Configure passive interface default under OSPF routing process. And, enable specific interfaces using no passive interface .
•Configure passive interface for the user VLANS and stub-networks.
•In a broadcast multi-access LAN segment, deterministically assign the DR and BDR to different routers so that one router does not end up being the  DR for many segments.
•If there are only two neighbors in a broadcast multi-access LAN segment (like Ethernet) and no additional neighbors will be added, configure the two  neighbor’s broadcast interfaces as ‘ospf point-to-point’ network type.
•Choose the Appropriate OSPF Network type for your Wan Topology. Prefer Point to Point, or Point to Multipoint.

IP Addressing


•Start off with a large address space.
•Assign large blocks to each OSPF area (anticipate the future needs).
•On Access Servers, assign contiguous blocks (from the area’s assigned block) for dial up connections (/32 host addresses for each line).
•Allocate addresses based on topology/geography.

Backbone Area


•Virtual link may be used if physical link cannot be available.
•If virtual link is used, make sure that the IOS code has the TransitCapability, CSCdi62634
•Provide redundant connections in the backbone area to prevent it from becoming discontiguous. Single link failures should not result in area partitions.
•To achieve higher stability at the backbone area, one should have reliable, high bandwidth links, faster CPU routers with sufficient memory.
•It is a good practice to configure a loopback as part of area 0, so that the ABR status remains unchanged if the router looses its backbone  connection. This will help the connected areas to exchange traffic.

Load Balancing


•If multiple equal cost paths are available to the same destination through multiple VLANs/interfaces, configure traffic-share min across-interfaces command under OSPF routing process.
•In a switched environment with multiple VLANS on the same physical trunk, OSPF forms neighbor relationship on many VLANS which may be unnecessary. There should be clear distinction between transit networks and local networks. For OSPF to exchange routing information, it doesn’t have to form neighbor relationship with all the VLANS on the trunk. Instead, a dedicated VLAN can be used for OSPF neighbor relationship and transit network. These VLANS can also be designed to eliminate spanning-tree convergence issues. Passive-interface can be used to limit the neighbor relations.

OSPF through GRE Tunnel


•Consider GRE Tunnel only when direct physical connection is not feasible.
•When building GRE Tunnel and enabling OSPF on the Tunnel, the ‘Tunnel Destination’ should not be learned through the Tunnel itself.
•When building GRE Tunnels for connecting the ABRs that summarize the non-backbone areas, the Tunnel itself should be built through Area 0 though  the GRE Tunnel interfaces belong to a non-backbone area. (In other words, the GRE Tunnel source and destination loop back interfaces should belong  to OSPF Area 0 though the GRE tunnel interfaces belong to non-backbone Area).
•The OSPF Cost for the Tunnel need to be verified and adjusted for optimal path selection in failure scenarios.

OSPF flood reduction


•OSPF Flood reduction can be enabled on any router as long as the feature is supported, no harm can be done by this fature
•OSPF Flood reduction is used to minimize the LS aging process over a link so its usage is universal
•OSPF Flood reduction may not work properly if neighboring router do not support DC bit(RFC 1793)
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...